 |
Big Tobacco has a history of lying. For most of the
20th Century, the industry denied that nicotine was
addictive and that smoking was dangerous. But in private,
executives knew. Company documents prove it.
Hollywood has a history of pretending, too. That's
entertainment. But over the last decade, the U.S. film
industry has consistently exaggerated both the number
of smokers and their social status. Rather than "reflecting
reality," smoking in the movies echos the themes in
tobacco company advertising and promotion. For Hollywood
to ignore the record of Big Tobacco pay-offs and defend
its portrayals of smoking as "free expression" is an
insult to the
First Amendment. It would be laughable if it were
not so dangerous.
Smoking in movies has
skyrocketed since 1990 when Big Tobacco promised
Congress it would stop paying for brand placement in
the movies.
Smoking
in PG13 movies increased 50% in the first two
years (1999-2000) after Big Tobacco signed agreements
with the state Attorneys General promising to end product
placement in movies. Kids now get most of their exposure to smoking in PG-13 movies, not R, as used to be the case.
Smoking in the Movies Does Not Reflect Reality
- In the real world, smokers tend to be poor and less
educated. In the movies, it is the powerful and successful
who smoke the most.
- In the real world, smoking kills smokers.
- In the real world, smokers' families suffer while
the tobacco industry accumulates billions in profts.
- In the real world, second-hand smoke kills non-smokers.
- In the real world, tobacco accounts for more suffering
and death than homicide, suicide, illegal drugs and
AIDS combined.
|
 |