 |
 March
25 , 2008 —
New York State Commissioner
of Health urges public to write
the six largest U.S. media companies
urging them to adopt Smoke Free
Movie's four policy solutions
Four of the companies are based
in New York. On February 19,
he ran an open letter tho the companies
full page advertisements in the
New York Times and Wall
Street Journal. (Read the Commissioner's
letters
and see the ad,
and some of the responses: several
health groups, AMA/AMAA,
LA
Deparment of Public Health,
American
Academy of Pediatrics, and an
entertainment
lawyer.) On March 25, he followed
up with another
ad (and a press
statement) urging the public
to write the companies. Support
the Commissioner by downloading
six clip-and-mail messages (PDF)
and mailing them.
Quick, easy and effective!
While you are at it, you can email Commissioner Daines to thank him for his leadership by clicking here.
|
|
|
The
U.S. film industry can take four simple steps to substantially
reduce the impact of adolescent exposure to smoking
on screen. None of these steps requires government action.
None restricts creative choices. All are voluntary and
transparent. All are based on the published research.
Together, they will avert tobacco addiction, disease
and death on a massive scale.
1.
Rate new smoking movies "R".
Any film that shows or implies tobacco should be rated
"R." The only exceptions should be when the
presentation of tobacco clearly and unambiguously reflects
the dangers and consequences of tobacco use or is necessary
to represent the smoking of a real historical figure.
Where we are now: As of 2006, 70% of adults supported R rating smoking movies, a 10% increase over earlier years. The studios continue to stonewall, exposing kids to billions of images of smoking in youth-rated films. Their political arm, the MPAA, announced that it would "consider" smoking in assigning ratings, but has yet to rate a single smoking movie "R," regardless of how smokey it is.
2.
Certify no pay-offs.
The producers should post a certificate in the closing
credits declaring that nobody on the production received
anything of value (cash money, free cigarettes or other
gifts, free publicity, interest-free loans or anything
else) from anyone in exchange for using or displaying
tobacco.
Where
we are now:
In January 2008, Time Warner began including the following
language in the end credits of all domestically distributed
DVDs that contain tobacco products or imagery: “No
person or entity associated with this film received
payment or anything of value, or entered into any agreement,
in connection with the depiction of tobacco products.”
Starting in fall 2008, they will be adding the certification
to theatrical releases.
GE
Universal indicates while of their movies include smoking
in fine print in their advertising and also added the
weaker statement, "The depictions of tobacco smoking
contained in this film are based solely on artistic
consideration and are not intended to promote tobacco
consumption. The Surgeon General has determined that
there are serious health risks associated with smoking
and with secondhand smoke" at the end of the credits
for films that include smoking.
3.
Require strong anti-smoking
ads.
Studios and theaters should run a proven-effective
anti-smoking ad (not produced by a tobacco company) to run before any film with any tobacco presence,
in any distribution channel, regardless of its MPAA
rating.
Where
we are now:
As of 2006, two-thirds of adults supported this recommendation. The Weinstein Brothers and the six major studios are
including effective anti-smoking spots from the American
Legacy Foundation or State of California on DVDs, but
not yet in theaters. Most are only including them on
youth-rated films, despite the fact that kids see smoking
in R-rated films, too. (Time Warner includes the spots
on DVDs of R-rated films.)
4.
Stop identifying tobacco
brands.
There should be no tobacco brand identification nor
the presence of tobacco brand imagery (such as billboards)
in the background of any movie scene.
Where we are now: There is less brand identification now than there was a few years ago.
A growing majority supports smokefree movie policies
Strong public support for meaningful change is why the studios have stated to move. As of February, 2007, eighty-one percent of adults in the United States agreed adolescents are more likely to smoke if they watch actors smoke in movies, and 70 percent support a new R-rating for any movies with on-screen tobacco imagery, unless the film clearly demonstrates the dangers of smoking.
The Social Climate Survey of Tobacco Control is an annual poll of public attitudes about tobacco control policies. According to the report (PDF):
- Support for an ‘R’-rating for movies with tobacco that fail to portray its health risks jumped nearly 12 percentage points between 2005 and 2006.
- Two-thirds of adults want movie theaters to show anti-tobacco spots before any film with tobacco images, up more than five percentage points from the year before.
- More than 60 percent of adults want tobacco branding out of all movie scenes, a rise of nearly seven percentage points from the previous year.
The four Smoke Free Movies policies are endorsed by:
- World
Health Organization
- American Lung Association
- American
Medical Association
- American Medical Association Alliance
- American
Academy of Pediatrics
- American
Legacy Foundation
- American
Heart Association
- American Public Health Association
- American
Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology
- Americans for Nonsmokers Rights
- California School Nurses Association
- Center for Tobacco Free Kids
- Society
for Adolescent Medicine
- Los
Angeles Department of Health Services
- National Network on Tobacco Prevention and Poverty (on behalf of Association of Gospel Rescue Missions, National Coalition for the Homeless, National Commission on Correctional Health Care, Rural Alaska Community Action Program, The Salvation Army, West Virgina University, Prevention Research Center, West Virgina Bureau for Public Health)
- New York State Department of Health
- New York State PTA
- Oklahoma State PTA
- US
Public Interest Research Group, and others.
|
 |